Social: Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan applies a double-blind peer review process. In this review system, reviewers do not know the identity of the author(s), and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. This process is intended to ensure an objective, fair, independent, and unbiased evaluation of every submitted manuscript.

The peer review process generally takes approximately 8–12 weeks, depending on reviewer availability, manuscript quality, and the revision process.

Peer Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Review

The Editor evaluates the submitted manuscript to determine whether it is suitable for the journal’s focus and scope, complies with the author guidelines, and meets academic writing standards.

At this stage, the manuscript is also checked using plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and compliance with publication ethics standards.

2. Reviewer Assignment

Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers through a double-blind review process.

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic qualifications, and research experience relevant to the manuscript topic.

3. Peer Review Evaluation

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on several academic aspects, including:

Originality and novelty

Relevance to the journal scope

Theoretical contribution

Methodological rigor

Clarity of presentation

Quality of analysis and discussion

Relevance and adequacy of references

Reviewers provide constructive comments, suggestions, and recommendations to both the editor and the authors.

4. Revision Process

The corresponding author receives reviewer comments through the journal system and is requested to revise the manuscript accordingly.

Authors are expected to provide clear responses to each reviewer comment and submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeframe.

Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.

5. Editorial Decision

The editorial team considers reviewers’ recommendations and determines the final editorial decision based on academic merit and journal standards.

6. Final Notification

The Editor communicates the final decision to the corresponding author through the journal submission system.

7. Copyediting and Publication

Accepted manuscripts proceed to the following publication stages:

Copyediting

Proofreading

Layout editing

Final publication

The editorial team may communicate with authors during this process to ensure publication quality and accuracy.

Review Outcomes

Reject

The manuscript is rejected and will not be published in Social: Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. Rejected manuscripts are generally not reconsidered unless specifically invited by the editor.

Major Revision

The manuscript requires substantial revisions and may undergo another round of peer review after resubmission.

Minor Revision

The manuscript requires minor revisions or improvements before acceptance. The revised manuscript may be evaluated by the editor and/or reviewers.

Accept

The manuscript is accepted for publication in its current or revised form.

Review Principles

The peer review process in Social: Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan is conducted according to the following principles:

Confidentiality of manuscripts is strictly maintained.

Reviews are conducted objectively, fairly, and professionally.

Editors and reviewers must avoid conflicts of interest.

Authors are expected to respond to reviewer comments respectfully and scientifically.

Editorial decisions are based solely on academic quality, originality, relevance, and journal standards.

The journal is committed to maintaining integrity, transparency, and ethical standards throughout the publication process.